While checking out some concerns submitted to SEJ after a recent webinar, two of them stuck out to me as related and comparable.
That means you’re in for a treat, gentile reader, because today’s a special 2-for-1 variation of Ask an SEO.
Here are the questions:
Ines asked: What do you make with old websites that have numerous URLs with very little traffic to the majority of them. Do you eliminate the bad content initially? Just how much should I remove at a time? Is there a guideline? Should I take internal links into account?
Christina asked: Is it much better to redirect old content to new material if that causes a redirect chain? Or should I simply erase that material?
Let’s Speak about Old Material
There’s a lot to unpack here, so let’s dive into it.
I’ll get my animal peeve out of the method first: Hopefully, you have dates on this old material, so that the readers who do stumble upon it understand that it’s old and outdated.
There are a couple of techniques you can take here, and a great deal of it depends upon your keyword research and information.
The very first question I ‘d ask myself for any piece of material is: Is this beneficial? Or is it hazardous (out of date, bad guidance, no longer relevant, and so on)?
If it’s harmful or no longer appropriate, like a blog post on how to grow your Google+ following, you can simply go ahead and delete it. There’s nothing relevant to reroute it to.
If it’s useful, you’re left with a few alternatives:
- Re-write it or integrate it with other material to see if you can get more traffic to it.
- If you currently have actually more upgraded or more relevant content, go ahead and 301 reroute it to that material.
- If it no longer uses to your website or organization, go on and erase it.
A lot of SEO pros will tell you that if it utilized to be a very popular piece with great deals of external links you should 301 it to protect those links.
I’ll inform you to either determine why it’s no longer super popular and update it or keep it up for historical purposes. It’s amazing just how much of the “old” internet no longer exists.
The secret here is to determine why the content isn’t popular.
When you do that you can follow the below recommendations:
– Does it fix a user requirement however is just poor quality? Re-write it.
– Is it no longer relevant/useful? Delete it.
– Exists more recent or better content somewhere else? Redirect it.
– Should I maintain it for historic reasons? Or exists simply little volume for that now, but I’m still getting traffic? Leave it alone.
OK, Now Let’s Speak about Redirects
Redirect chains get a lot of criticism in SEO.
There utilized to be a lots of argument about whether they pass PageRank, just how much PageRank they pass, just how much decays, how many Google will follow, etc.
For 99.9999925% of people, none of that matters.
If these are things we require to worry about, they’re so minimal that they do not have much of an impact. The reality is Google will follow redirects and will pass some “value” through them.
There’s no unfavorable impact or penalty from having redirect chains however go for not more than 5 hops as Google may drop from following the redirects.
Sure, they aren’t ideal. They will add a few milliseconds of load time for your page, and they might not send 100% of the PageRank value through to the location, however all that is minimal and, truthfully, over-thinking SEO.
When deciding if you need to redirect or delete material, use the rubric above.
And as a finest practice, if you have rerouted chains, bring them to a minimal by updating redirects to point straight to the last location.
For example, if you have A-> B-> C (one redirect chain), develop A-> C and B-> C (2 redirects) instead.
Hope this assists.
Have a concern about SEO? Submit via this form.
Featured Image: ANDRANIK HAKOBYAN/Best SMM Panel